Spokes Canterbury
  • ABOUT
    • OUR MISSION
    • OUR BACKGROUND
    • OUR TEAM
    • IN THE MEDIA
  • GET INVOLVED
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
    • GETTING ON A BIKE
    • MAPS AND RIDES
    • BIKE SHOPS
    • REPORT AN ISSUE
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
  • ABOUT
    • OUR MISSION
    • OUR BACKGROUND
    • OUR TEAM
    • IN THE MEDIA
  • GET INVOLVED
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
    • GETTING ON A BIKE
    • MAPS AND RIDES
    • BIKE SHOPS
    • REPORT AN ISSUE
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
30 June 2022  |  By Chris Abbott (Spokes) In Submissions

Waimakariri District Council – Walking And Cycling Network Plan Feedback 30June2022

WALKING AND CYCLING NETWORK PLAN FEEDBACK FORM Submission from Spokes Canterbury 30/6/22

https://letstalk.waimakariri.govt.nz/walking-and-cycling-network-plan

Greetings, Waimakariri District Council

This is a submission from Spokes Canterbury, submitted by email to the nominated officer, Allie Mace-Cochrane at allie.mace-cochrane@wmk.govt.nz .

Spokes Canterbury (http://www.spokes.org.nz/)  is a local cycling advocacy group with approximately 1,200 members and is affiliated with the national Cycling Action Network (CAN – https://can.org.nz/). Spokes is dedicated to including cycling as an everyday form of transport in the greater Christchurch area (including nearby district councils)

Should there be an officer’s report or similar document(s) we would appreciate a copy(s). We would like the opportunity to appear at any public hearing held to consider submissions on these projects.

Overall Spokes supports the cycling improvements proposed by Waimakariri District Council, but

  • Offers some suggestions as to how it should be improved farther.
  • Asks some questions where the plan is not clear

Q1 Have we got the right links and connections in place that provide a complete network?

At first impression yes, this is a significant move from having a few isolated cycleways, to establishing a connected network that allows a good choice of routes for people who choose to cycle.  In order to attract more people to cycling the main objective must be to lower both the actual risk and the perceived risk, as these are often the main deterrent to many people who would otherwise be interested in cycling.  If cycling can be made a viable option for short trips to school, shops, sports and community services then more people will choose to cycle, especially when the cost of living is a concern. The added bonus is that nearly every cyclist is one less motorist on the road! With the increasing popularity of e-bikes the length of trips that can be easily undertaken by cycling is increased, making it a feasible option for a greater range of travel trips within the district  (and also further afield to other districts, especially into Christchurch).  Investment in safe, connected cycleways and improved pedestrian safety benefits everyone – it is good for business, good for drivers, good for children, good for households, and improves health, well-being and the environment.

However we do have some concerns.  One is that there is only a very broad indication of the type of facility to be installed on each route. It is good to recognise that there are differing levels of skill and confidence in people travelling by bicycle, but there is a catch with this approach.  If a cycleway is designed only for high-confidence cyclists, then that leaves people without that level of confidence with a missing link in the network. We already have an example of this, in that potential users of the Passchendaele cycle path, a great separated cycleway, must navigate through some of Rangiora’s busiest roads and intersections to access it.

It would be a missed opportunity to build a cycleway past a school if it wasn’t to a standard that pupils of that school would be comfortable on (more importantly the parents of pupils must also be comfortable that the cycleway is safe for their children at all times that their children would use it). There might still be a place for a “high-confidence” cycleway or cycle route in places, but if so the network should have an alternative for lower confidence levels. It would be better for cycleways to be built in a way that caters for a larger range of people.  Waka Kotahi has published cycle network guidelines that will help.

The second concern is with the proposed schedule of building just a few key cycleways in each 3-year funding cycle. It would take 9 years to build just the facilities that are identified as level 1, 2 and 3 priorities, and who knows how long to complete the remainder – as there are many routes that are not identified as priorities. The school pupils who are at school now will have left, some of the older cyclists will be gone, and we might even have made progress on reducing private car use.  Timing is of the essence to ensure that a big cohort of current students and potential long-term active transport users miss the opportunity to engrain environmentally friendly behaviour into their lives). 

Another thing to consider is the first and last part of each journey, and in providing local connecting or feeder facilities where there’s a need.  Are residential areas friendly to cycles, or do they need some traffic calming? Do they have roads that are too narrow when lined by parked cars? Can some of the walkways that link cul-de-sacs be made into shared paths? Are all schools provided for? How well do public venues and shopping centres support cycling? Do they have big mall-like car parks to navigate? Can the main streets in each town be made more bicycle friendly? Do destinations have good places to park and lock bicycles?

In terms of links – it is great to see some attention to having a choice of routes between (and within) centres – especially routes through Kaiapoi North to link to Woodend, alternative routes from the south of Kaiapoi and Silverstream to Ohoka/Mandeville and the west of Rangiora, and additional routes within the Kaiapoi/Rangiora/Woodend triangle. Perhaps in the future a link from Waikuku into the Ravenswood/Pegasus shopping centre could be considered, and as Ohoka develops more a great cycle route to Rangiora could be created by a foot/cycle bridge to join Easterbrook and Bradleys Rd. At some point in the future a link from Southbrook into East Rangiora should be considered, whether it is something utilising the rail corridor, or part of a future development of a road link in that area.

There are a couple of new cycle routes marked on the maps, one in North Kaiapoi, east of Williams St, and a long ‘western bypass’ in Rangiora along the Southbrook stream, Lehmans Rd and through the racecourse. While these may be useful routes in the future they would appear surplus to requirements at present. Are these routes linked to anticipated development in those areas?

Priority Level Delivery Costs

Priority 1 – $ 1.7 million* could deliver the following routes:

  • Tram Road (Mandeville to Swannanoa School path) – Swannanoa
  • Ashley Street/Ivory Street/Percival Street – Rangiora
  • Railway Road/Torlesse Street/Coronation Street/Ellis Road Rangiora

Q2 Do you agree with the prioritisation of the routes in the priority 1 group?

No – please tell us what would you like changed below

Comments

The priorities chosen have been the result of community consultation and many people will feel strongest about the cycleway closest to them or their local school, sports facility or shops.  We offer a few comments on, rather than challenging the priority choices.

Tram Road from Mandeville to Swannanoa school is principally for the school population to travel along a relatively busy rural arterial. We wonder whether there should be anything to help pupils cross Tram Road. All of Tram Road is due for some cycle friendly treatment at some time, according to the district-wide map provided, but it doesn’t appear to be prioritised.

Ashley/Ivory/Percival St This is to provide a main north-south route into and through the centre of Rangiora. As it is one of the busier routes for motor vehicles, it will need careful treatment to make it more appealing and safe for cycling, and to connect with the existing cycle route into town via the Passchendaele cycle path and Southbrook Road. It’s likely that it will always be a route requiring high confidence, especially where the route has corners and intersections with Percival St, Victoria St and Northbrook Rd and the Blackett St roundabout.

Perhaps also the east-west connection of Oxford/Main/Kippenberger St should be addressed at the same time to add additional arterial links into Rangiora’s central shops and to the Woodend cycle path.

Ngā Haerenga NZ Cycle Trials promotes a heartland ride from Kaiapoi to Amberley, which travels from north to south through Rangiora. They currently show that as being along Southbrook Road, Percival St, High St and then Ashley St, although this is not well signposted.  If the route via Ivory St is made more favourable to cycling, perhaps the NZCT route should be changed to that. However, there is also a case for retaining the northern end of Percival St as a cycle route to give a good lower key cycle access to Rangiora’s central shops.

Railway/Torlesse/Coronation St looks like a good solution to providing an alternative  route into Rangiora from the Passchendaele cycle path and to provide Southbrook and New Life schools with cycle friendly facilities. Some cyclists will lack the confidence to travel along Southbrook Rd, and this route will provide an alternative, provided it connects well to other routes.

Consideration should be given to what comes next – i.e. is this the time to connect Coronation St to King St  (via Buckleys Rd) as an alternative cycleway from here north into Rangiora? The proposed route will have to cope with an area on Railway Rd that has high use by staff and delivery vehicles for the PAK’n’SAVE supermarket.

We’re confused by the mention of Ellis St – is there an unprioritised plan in the future to connect this to a new path along the Southbrook stream?

Priority 2 – $ 1.5 million* could deliver the following routes:

  • Harewood Road (High Street to Main Street) – Oxford
  • High Street (Main Street to Harewood Road) – Oxford
  • Earlys Road (end of current facility to Springbank Road) – Cust
  • Mandeville Road (McHughs Road to Mandeville Sports Ground)- Ohoka
  • Tuahiwi Road (urban limits) – Tuahiwi
  • Williams Street (north) – Kaiapoi
  • Sandhill Road (Williams Street to Woodend Beach Road) – Woodend

Q3 Do you agree with the prioritisation of the routes in the priority 2 group?

No

Comments

Harewood Road and High St, Oxford.  From a cycling perspective, we’re not sure why this would be a higher priority in Oxford than the Main St or connections on Bay and Church Roads to the school. However, we understand it is a popular walking route. Perhaps there should be some thought and consultation as to whether a footpath or a shared-use path is the best option here.

Earlys Rd, Cust. It will be good to connect the school to the main route through Cust. It could also be the time to extend links within Cust and to Mill Rd to give Cust an improved network, but some of that is currently listed as a third level priority.

Mandeville Rd.  Not a large distance required to provide access from town to the sports ground. Other feeder roads to Mandeville are marked for cycleways, but not prioritised.

Tuahiwi Rd (urban limits).  This road always seems quiet and has recently been given a 40km/h speed limit through Tuahiwi, so that already helps make it cycle friendly. The question is whether that is enough?  The district-wide map shows the entire length of Tuahiwi Rd is due for some cycleway treatment, but when?

Williams Street (north) – Kaiapoi. This will be useful, especially for the Kaiapoi North school. The pressing issue is to either assist in crossing SH1 where traffic is coming off the motorway, or alternatively have a facility along the east side of SH1 up to Woodend to avoid a crossing.

Sandhill Rd Woodend.  Including this route suggests that the connection from Kaiapoi North to Woodend mentioned above is also being prioritised, which would be great.

Priority 3 – $ 2 million* could deliver the following routes:

  • Main Street (urban limits) – Oxford
  • Cust Road (through the township) – Cust
  • Old North Road/Ranfurly Street/Walker Street OR Lower Camside Road – Kaiapoi
  • Woodend to Pegasus (SH1)

Q4 Do you agree with the prioritisation of the routes in the priority 3 group?

No

Comments

Main St, Oxford. It would be good to do this as there’s a mix of local and through traffic. Is it also the time to link cycleways to the area school?

Cust Road (through the township). Good to do, help coping with the mix of local and through traffic.

Old North Road/Ranfurly Street/Walker Street OR Lower Camside Road – Kaiapoi

It would be good to provide an alternative to Williams St for less confident cyclists, but either route will end up feeding into Williams St at the north end. Both are quite narrow roads at present.

Woodend to Pegasus (SH1). This is as much a connection to the new shopping centre on the SH1/Pegasus/Ravenswood junction as it is to Pegasus town. It will complement the link from via Gladstone Rd to residential Pegasus. It will be good to have as the shopping centre grows, but will need care in designing as it’s interacting with the full traffic of SH1 – perhaps requiring an over-bridge or under-pass.

Total – $5.2 million* to deliver all the priority routes

(1,2,3) identified in the plan.

* Costs above are indicative and could be subject to change

Q5 What level of investment should Council contribute to building this walking and cycling plan?

More investment – We would support a higher level of investment by Council

in building this walking and cycling plan, meaning that the priorities will be delivered in less than 10 years (subject to funding approvals), and consideration given to building parts of the network that are not yet prioritised.

As co-funding with Waka Kotahi is indicated, at least for the prioritised routes, we would assume that projects will follow the network design guidelines published by Waka Kotahi, and it may be that their business case analysis is part of the funding equation. These measures would help ensure that cycleways are built according to best practice.

Q6 Any other general comments or feedback on the walking and cycling network plan?

There are several routes that are shown as planned cycleways on the various maps that are not listed at all in the three priority lists.  These include

–several links within Rangiora

Oxford Rd – High St – Kippenberger Rd

Boys Rd – South Belt – Pentecost Rd

Fernside Rd – Townsend Rd – West Belt

Johns Rd – Northbrook Rd

King St – Envrton Dr

Kingsbury Ave – Wales St – East Belt

Golf Links Rd – Coldstream S – River Rd

a new “western bypass”: South Brook – Lehmans Rd – racecourse

–several links within Kaiapoi

Ohoka Rd – Isaac Wilson Rd – Robert Coup Rd

Courtenay Rd – Hinton St – Raven Quay

Island Rd, Silverstream Bvd – Adderly Tce – Fuller St

Cass, Davie, Smith Sts

linking Skewbank Rd to Ohoka Rd

a wider bridge at the end of Raven Quay?

a new northeastern link – East of Williams Rd

–several links within smaller town centres

Oxford: Ashley Gorge Rd, Bay, Church, Burnett & High Sts

Mandeville: Bradleys, McHugh, Mandeville, No 10 & Wards Rds

Ohoka: Bradleys & Threlkelds Rd

Tuahiwi: Tuahiwi Rd

Cust: Mill Rd

Waikuku Beach: Reserve Rd, Park Tce

Woodend: Copper Beach & Woodend Rds

Pegasus: Lakeside ,Tiritiri Moana & Te Kohanga Drives

–main rural arterial roads

Oxford Rd, Tram Rd,

Island, Ohoka, Skewbridge, Flaxton, Fernside, Boys & Tuahiwi Rds

–all of the indicated improvements north of the Ashley River

Upper Sefton, Marshmans, Dixons, Lowburn-Whiterock & Hodgsons Rds

When are these planned?  For routes that are well outside of the town areas, it might be sufficient to have cycleways that are of a different standard to that expected in an urban setting.  The concerns for cyclists there are whether they are confident judging interactions with vehicles at higher speeds, whether there is sufficient roadway width for them to be comfortable when passed by those vehicles, and being able to identify and safely interact with turning vehicles.

An additional concern is the level of lighting appropriate to rural and urban routes to ensure safety.

Complete the survey online
https://letstalk.waimakariri.govt.nz/walking-and-cycling-network-plan?
Freepost Authority Number 1667
Attention: Allie Mace-Cochrane

Lets Privacy Statement. https://letstalk.waimakariri.govt.nz/privacy.
If there are good reasons why your details and/or submission should be kept confidential, please contact our Engagement Manager on 0800 965 468.
If you have any questions regarding the Walking and Cycling Plan please contact:
Allie Mace-Cochrane
Waimakariri District Council
Phone: 0800 965 468
Email: allie.mace-cochrane@wmk.govt.nz 
Return this feedback form(no stamp required) to us by Thursday 30 June 2022.

Waimakariri Waimakariri District Council WDC
Previous StoryAshburton District Council Play, Active Recreation and Sport Strategy
Next StorySH1 Rolleston Flyover – NZTA

Latest Posts

  • Aotearoa Bike Challenge Thursday, 12, Jan
  • Bikepacking Talk – Biketober 2022 Wednesday, 26, Oct
  • Reshaping Streets Tuesday, 20, Sep
  • Waterloo Road Safety Improvements Monday, 15, Aug
  • GoogleMap.NorthcoteRd.and.surroundings
    Northcote Road and Lydia Street Transport Improvements Wednesday, 10, Aug

Recent Comments

  • Photo of the Day: Belfast Rd Cycle Subway – Cycling in Christchurch on CCC CNC DEMP Northern Arterial

Categories

Tags

Accessible City Advocacy Annual Plan Ashburton Ashburton District Council Brougham Street Cashmere CBD CCC CDHB Ferry Rd Hoon Hay infrastructure Innovating Streets legislation Linwood Village Lower Cashmere Lydia St MCR neighbourhoods Northcote Rd NZTA Opawa Otakaro Papanui parking policy public transport recreation Reshaping Streets Rolleston safety schools colleges Selwyn SH76 slow speeds Smarts Road speed speed limits Stanmore Road Strategy Submissions surburban Waterloo Road Worcester Street

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • October 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016

About

Spokes is a non-profit organisation run by volunteers that create ways for the people of Canterbury get more out of their bike rides.
 

Follow Spokes on Facebook:

WHO WE ARE

  • OUR TEAM
  • MEDIA
  • CONTACT
  • SUBMISSIONS

SPOKES NEWSLETTER

WHAT WE DO

  • OUR MISSION
  • GET INVOLVED
  • EVENTS
  • GALLERY

ABOUT US

A member organisation of CAN (Cycle Action Network) NZ. We're a non-profit, all-volunteer organisation dedicated to making cycling work for the Christchurch community.

FOLLOW SPOKES

OUR SPONSORS