Spokes Canterbury
  • ABOUT
    • OUR MISSION
    • OUR BACKGROUND
    • OUR TEAM
    • IN THE MEDIA
  • GET INVOLVED
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
    • GETTING ON A BIKE
    • MAPS AND RIDES
    • BIKE SHOPS
    • REPORT AN ISSUE
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
  • ABOUT
    • OUR MISSION
    • OUR BACKGROUND
    • OUR TEAM
    • IN THE MEDIA
  • GET INVOLVED
  • SUBMISSIONS
  • BLOG
  • RESOURCES
    • GETTING ON A BIKE
    • MAPS AND RIDES
    • BIKE SHOPS
    • REPORT AN ISSUE
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE

Submissions

Draft and then final Spokes submissions on agency projects and strategies/plan
14 June 2018  |  By Dirk De Lu In Submissions

CCC Woolston Village

cycle in traffic

CCC Woolston Village Sub

Opens 5.6.18 closes 3.7.18

https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/consultations-and-submissions/haveyoursay/show/151

Spokes sub made 2.7.18

With cycle lanes of 1.6 to 1.8m width with no buffer zone hard up against on street parking this project is unsafe and fails to apply Council’s own Cycle Design Guidelines while undermining Council’s stated intent to encourage the ‘interested but concerned’ cyclist. Big gains in both reducing congestion and personal health come from people choosing to use bikes for their short local trips. These gains are not supported by this project.

That the narrow width is to accommodate landscaping and street furniture both of which are dispensed with where on street parking is prioritized makes clear that catering to cars is the priority.

The central median of up to 1.8m along with cycle lanes will encourage cars to use the cycle lanes to pass turning cars and squeeze past cars using on street parks. Along with the bus stops which block cycle lanes people on bicycles will be forced to use the carriageway with cars for safety. We can all hear the impatient tooting of horns as drivers insist on having their space free of people on bicycles. This will discourage the interested but concerned cyclists.

This project does not support real mode choice or a transition to more sustainable transport choices. It has compromised safety and amenity in the face of business as usual Nimbyism.  A neighbourhood shared space may well be a better option. The proposed 30 km/h speed limit supports this.

People who ride bicycles need to travel to the same places as cars. They wish to do so efficiently. Routes which offer more pleasant and safer cycling are great, but do not apply to areas they do not serve or when too far from desire lines. Major Cycle Routes work when Local Cycle Networks provides safe passage for complete journeys. For mode choice to be supported roads need to offer safe cycling.

Existing & Proposed Hazards

  • Poor visibility to the west at New World car park driveway
  • Side roads and driveways with no give way markings where cars currently protrude into the cycle lane to gain visibility and endanger people on bicycles
  • Frequent pedestrian crossings with on street parking blocking visibility for both road users and pedestrians
  • Narrow cycle lanes without door buffer zones hard up against on street parking
  • Tree plantings by the Day and Night car park driveway which will block visibility
  • Parking lot on north side near Portman has trees by driveway to block vision of both cars leaving and cycles seeing. How will driveways be prevented from blocking footpath and cycle lane?

 

Council staff has advised that NZTA cycle guidelines have been applied. They are inapplicable. Quoting from those guidelines “Cycle lanes are painted lanes within the carriageway that are suitable for enthused and confident cyclists but, apart from low volume streets, do not offer sufficient protection for the majority of interested but concerned cyclists.” https://www.nzta.govt.nz/walking-cycling-and-public-transport/cycling/cycling-network-guidance/designing-a-cycle-facility/between-intersections/cycle-lanes/#cycle-lanes-next-to-kerb

As proposed the project is only partially compliant with Council’s Cycle Design Guidelines. Quoting the relevant section:

“3.2.3. Local cycleways/Urban commercial centres/Cycle lanes: Design principles

In commercial centres where a separated cycle path is not appropriate, a wide cycle lane should be considered. The design principles are:

  • · The cycle lane ideally needs to be wide enough for cyclists to pass one another (approximately 1.8 to 2m). A wider lane also gives cyclists more protection from traffic movement and car doors opening into the cycle lane.”

 

Reallocation of space could easily provide a safer road environment for all road users. Worldwide, planners are discovering that if a project is good for walking, biking and mobility, it is good for everyone. Life does not end, nor does the economy shrivel where street design considers cars as invited guests, rather than the priority.

Spokes accepts that road space is in demand by all road users and staff must seek a balance in allocating space. That balance must still support the goal of encouraging interested but concerned cyclists, the need to ‘future proof’ infrastructure and to support the Zero Road Deaths targets being mooted by central government.

 

Council legitimately seeks to deliver projects efficiently and affordably. Adding the costs of a safety audit to projects may seem to undermine these goals. Yet, producing infrastructure which offers poor safety leading to limited use and which will need expensive reworking is not efficient or affordable. It also sacrifices amenity and potentially human lives.

 

Spokes requests that staff redesigns this project with 2m wide cycle lanes or use a shared streets approach.  A safety audit to assess dangers and mitigations is also required. Without this information being made publicly available as part of the consultation process neither Councillors nor the public can assess impacts and options.

 

Spokes supports the 30 km/h speed limit and asks that it be permanent.

Spokes supports the provision of 36 cycle parking spots. Room for expansion should be considered and shown as part of this plan.

Spokes urges Councillor’s to reinstate the Cycle Advisory Panel and to create designated ‘Cycle Champions’ on staff to assure that projects at least comply with the Cycle Design Guidelines, improve road safety and support mode choice. Efficiency, affordability, safety and amenity will all benefit.

 

Advocacy infrastructure neighbourhoods speed limits
Previous StoryCCC Cranford Street Changes
Next Story2Walk&Cycle Conference 2018

Related Articles

  • Reshaping Streets
  • Bicycle_Accident
    CCC Colombo to Papanui

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

Latest Posts

  • Aotearoa Bike Challenge Thursday, 12, Jan
  • Bikepacking Talk – Biketober 2022 Wednesday, 26, Oct
  • Reshaping Streets Tuesday, 20, Sep
  • Waterloo Road Safety Improvements Monday, 15, Aug
  • GoogleMap.NorthcoteRd.and.surroundings
    Northcote Road and Lydia Street Transport Improvements Wednesday, 10, Aug

Recent Comments

  • Photo of the Day: Belfast Rd Cycle Subway – Cycling in Christchurch on CCC CNC DEMP Northern Arterial

Categories

Tags

Accessible City Advocacy Annual Plan Ashburton Ashburton District Council Brougham Street Cashmere CBD CCC CDHB Ferry Rd Hoon Hay infrastructure Innovating Streets legislation Linwood Village Lower Cashmere Lydia St MCR neighbourhoods Northcote Rd NZTA Opawa Otakaro Papanui parking policy public transport recreation Reshaping Streets Rolleston safety schools colleges Selwyn SH76 slow speeds Smarts Road speed speed limits Stanmore Road Strategy Submissions surburban Waterloo Road Worcester Street

Archives

  • January 2023
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • March 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • February 2021
  • October 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • May 2017
  • March 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016

About

Spokes is a non-profit organisation run by volunteers that create ways for the people of Canterbury get more out of their bike rides.
 

Follow Spokes on Facebook:

WHO WE ARE

  • OUR TEAM
  • MEDIA
  • CONTACT
  • SUBMISSIONS

SPOKES NEWSLETTER

WHAT WE DO

  • OUR MISSION
  • GET INVOLVED
  • EVENTS
  • GALLERY

ABOUT US

A member organisation of CAN (Cycle Action Network) NZ. We're a non-profit, all-volunteer organisation dedicated to making cycling work for the Christchurch community.

FOLLOW SPOKES

OUR SPONSORS